Development of new SA Cancer Plan

Consultation has concluded. Thanks for your contributions.

To comment on the draft SA Cancer Plan please go to yoursay.sa.gov.au/sa-cancer-plan-2 

SA Health is developing a new 5 year SA Cancer Plan to guide how cancer care is provided to South Australians, and would like your input.

What's being decided?

We want to hear about your experiences with cancer prevention and care in South Australia, and your ideas about where and how we should focus our efforts in the future. We want to hear from anyone who is involved in cancer care, whether you are a key organisation representing specific cancer types, a clinician, researcher, have a friend or family member with cancer, have cancer yourself or have previously had a cancer diagnosis.

We will use this information to understand what is currently happening in cancer care in South Australia, and to shape future strategies.

Background

SA Health is undertaking a project to develop a new cancer plan for South Australia. Implementation of a new SA Cancer Plan is a 2022 State Government election commitment.

The SA Cancer Plan will be a five-year plan which provides clear guidance to SA Health and its partners regarding an agreed vision, priorities, future directions and approach to cancer care. When we talk about cancer care we include all domains of the cancer spectrum including prevention, screening, diagnosis, treatment, survivorship and palliative care as well as cancer data collection, research and clinical trials.

The completed SA Cancer Plan will be implemented and used to inform high level future decisions on service planning and resource allocations, including where SA Health funded cancer services will be delivered.

Get involved

We are committed to understanding what is happening in cancer in South Australia and working with all people with an interest to develop the future strategies and priorities for cancer care in the next five years. We are keen to hear about how people currently experience cancer care in South Australia, including from those who provide the care, people who support someone who is receiving care and people receiving cancer care.

Find out more:

  • Take a look at our FAQs

Have your say by:

  • Sharing your story
  • Sharing your ideas
  • Responding to a survey
  • Registering for an upcoming workshop at eventbrite.com
  • Emailing a submission to: health.sacancerplan@sa.gov.au
  • Sending a written submission to: SA Cancer Plan Project Team, System Design and Planning, Department for Health and Wellbeing, Level 8 / 11 Hindmarsh Square, Adelaide 5000
  • Showing us where you are from on the map

More information on each of these opportunities can be found in the individual modules. Please remember to provide your input in a respectful manner and consider your own and other people’s privacy.

We will provide regular project updates on this page, and additional opportunities for engagement will be announced as the project progresses.

What are the next steps?

We will use all your feedback to inform the Current State Analysis and Recommendations Report, which we will publish on this page. We will announce more ways to engage with the Cancer Plan after this report is released, as part of developing future strategies and priorities.

To comment on the draft SA Cancer Plan please go to yoursay.sa.gov.au/sa-cancer-plan-2 

SA Health is developing a new 5 year SA Cancer Plan to guide how cancer care is provided to South Australians, and would like your input.

What's being decided?

We want to hear about your experiences with cancer prevention and care in South Australia, and your ideas about where and how we should focus our efforts in the future. We want to hear from anyone who is involved in cancer care, whether you are a key organisation representing specific cancer types, a clinician, researcher, have a friend or family member with cancer, have cancer yourself or have previously had a cancer diagnosis.

We will use this information to understand what is currently happening in cancer care in South Australia, and to shape future strategies.

Background

SA Health is undertaking a project to develop a new cancer plan for South Australia. Implementation of a new SA Cancer Plan is a 2022 State Government election commitment.

The SA Cancer Plan will be a five-year plan which provides clear guidance to SA Health and its partners regarding an agreed vision, priorities, future directions and approach to cancer care. When we talk about cancer care we include all domains of the cancer spectrum including prevention, screening, diagnosis, treatment, survivorship and palliative care as well as cancer data collection, research and clinical trials.

The completed SA Cancer Plan will be implemented and used to inform high level future decisions on service planning and resource allocations, including where SA Health funded cancer services will be delivered.

Get involved

We are committed to understanding what is happening in cancer in South Australia and working with all people with an interest to develop the future strategies and priorities for cancer care in the next five years. We are keen to hear about how people currently experience cancer care in South Australia, including from those who provide the care, people who support someone who is receiving care and people receiving cancer care.

Find out more:

  • Take a look at our FAQs

Have your say by:

  • Sharing your story
  • Sharing your ideas
  • Responding to a survey
  • Registering for an upcoming workshop at eventbrite.com
  • Emailing a submission to: health.sacancerplan@sa.gov.au
  • Sending a written submission to: SA Cancer Plan Project Team, System Design and Planning, Department for Health and Wellbeing, Level 8 / 11 Hindmarsh Square, Adelaide 5000
  • Showing us where you are from on the map

More information on each of these opportunities can be found in the individual modules. Please remember to provide your input in a respectful manner and consider your own and other people’s privacy.

We will provide regular project updates on this page, and additional opportunities for engagement will be announced as the project progresses.

What are the next steps?

We will use all your feedback to inform the Current State Analysis and Recommendations Report, which we will publish on this page. We will announce more ways to engage with the Cancer Plan after this report is released, as part of developing future strategies and priorities.

Stories

Please tell us your experiences with cancer prevention or care in South Australia.

Please include within your story whether you are:

  • experiencing or have experienced cancer 
  • supporting or have supported someone with cancer 
  • a health professional 
  • a researcher
  • other.

Your story will help us to understand the experiences of people in South Australia with cancer and those who are caring for or supporting those with cancer.  

Your story will be published on this site and available to be read by the public.  Please remember to remain respectful and do not include any information that could compromise the privacy of yourself or other.

Thank you for taking the time to share your story with us and contribute to the SA Cancer Plan.  We will read what you have said and incorporate the themes from everything we hear into a report that will be released publicly.  The information in the report will inform the development of the SA Cancer Plan.  

Please keep a watch on the YourSAy website for regular updates and future engagement opportunities on the SA Cancer Plan. 

CLOSED: This discussion has concluded.

  • Car T Cell: SA needs it.

    by Jaypo, over 3 years ago
    I have been living with cancer on and off since 2012, namely large diffuse B cell Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. My first experience was in the private system but after a relapse in 2019 I was referred to Dr. Uwe Hahn and his team at the RAH. After a stem cell transplant I once more achieved remission. Things became more tricky when I again relapsed in 2022. This time I was offered Car T Cell Therapy. For anyone unfamiliar with this it is quite literally the stuff of science fiction. Cells are harvested from your body, sent to America where your cells... Continue reading
    I have been living with cancer on and off since 2012, namely large diffuse B cell Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. My first experience was in the private system but after a relapse in 2019 I was referred to Dr. Uwe Hahn and his team at the RAH. After a stem cell transplant I once more achieved remission. Things became more tricky when I again relapsed in 2022. This time I was offered Car T Cell Therapy. For anyone unfamiliar with this it is quite literally the stuff of science fiction. Cells are harvested from your body, sent to America where your cells are engineered into killer T cells that are cancer fighting machines. The cells come back home and are infused into your body where they fight your cancer. The downside was I would have to go to Melbourne for treatment. Which seemed OK in theory but let me tell you life would have been much easier if this amazing life saving treatment were done in Adelaide. There is a fabulous dedicated hard working team of doctors nurses and technicians who would love to be able to offer this treatment to all South Australians. This would be a wonderful development in cancer care for the future. Although presently only used with blood cancers there are possibilities for other cancers and chronic incurable diseases. My team in Melbourne were amazing. They have a wonderful reputation throughout the world. So why can’t we do it here? Our fantastic medical staff are totally capable and willing. 6 weeks away from home was arduous to say the least. As an experienced cancer patient I know the best place to have treatment and particularly recuperate is at home surrounded by friends and family. I came on leaps and bounds once I was home. And by the way I did achieve complete remission.
    I really hope that one day Adelaide will be able to join the other major Australian cities in offering this treatment. It’s an investment in the future and a life saver for all those patients who may be too sick to travel to have their treatment out of state.



  • AL Amyloidosis - a bone marrow related cancer

    by Lyall Pearce, over 3 years ago

    From my Sisters perspective, as a primary carer.

    Everybody’s journey is unique, everyone reacts to medications &treatment procedures differently. This is about my brother’sjourney with Cardiac (AL) Amyloidosis through my eyes as one of hisclosest advocates. I share this story in hope that it may helpothers; especially if you are like me and are wanting to help &support your sick loved ones too. The bottom line is never give-up,there is always hope.

    My Name is VeronicaPearce. I’ve been living in the USA as an expat Australian since1999. In October 2015 I was on a morning walk in San Antonio(Texas), when... Continue reading

    From my Sisters perspective, as a primary carer.

    Everybody’s journey is unique, everyone reacts to medications &treatment procedures differently. This is about my brother’sjourney with Cardiac (AL) Amyloidosis through my eyes as one of hisclosest advocates. I share this story in hope that it may helpothers; especially if you are like me and are wanting to help &support your sick loved ones too. The bottom line is never give-up,there is always hope.

    My Name is VeronicaPearce. I’ve been living in the USA as an expat Australian since1999. In October 2015 I was on a morning walk in San Antonio(Texas), when I received a phone call from my brother Lyall Pearcewho was living in Adelaide, Australia. He told me his medical testresults were back and his doctors suspected he had some form ofMyeloma that was adversely affecting his heart. I stopped walking,sat down on the side of the road, he explained it as a blood/bonecancer and said they had a few more tests to perform and we wouldknow more within the few days.

    Sure enough, severaldays later Lyall’s formal diagnosis came back as Cardiac (AL)Amyloidosis which is a complication of Myeloma. Icouldn’t even pronounce these words, let-alone understand what theymeant. After some research online I learnt myeloma is a form of bonemarrow cancer where the plasma cells (produced from the bone marrow)are faulty. In Lyall’s case these faulty cells produce antibodiesthat misfold into a plaque-like protein (amyloid) that graduallydeposit in the heart tissue, slowly thickening his heart walls,adversely affecting his heart – hence the diagnosis of Cardiac (AL)Amyloidosis.

    In the year prior tohis diagnosis Lyall knew something was medically wrong, his cardiacfitness was deteriorating quickly and significantly, he was findingit harder and harder each day to ride up hills on his normal 20kmround trip daily cycle to & from work. At the time he wasdiagnosed (October 2015), his prognosis was terminal, and he wasgiven 18 months to live.



    The windy road wefollowed through the progression of Lyall’s treatments …



    Despite a poorprognosis, Lyall’s medical team established the best way forwardwas a treatment regime of firstly chemotherapy shortly followed witha Stem Cell Transplant to remove the faulty plasma cells in hope toextend his life.

    In the days &weeks following Lyall’s diagnosis we had so many questions. It wastotally overwhelming. The best thing I did at that time wasself-education: reading hospital issued brochures, literature fromthe Leukaemia Foundation, online research, forums, and lots ofquestions to Doctors, staff at the Foundations, other patients we metin waiting rooms and anyone else who could offer any insights &guidance. Much of the documentation I read initially I couldn’tunderstand, all the medical terms and complexity of it all was liketrying to read something in a foreign language. But as I graduallylearnt what the terms meant (Google Search became my best friend)things started to make a little bit more sense.

    We learnt there weresome critical parameters we needed to start following to monitorLyall’s health. Like someone with Diabetes who closely monitortheir blood sugar levels and they take corrective action when its lowor high. For Lyall’s Cardiac Amyloidosis the main parameters wereinitially: Lambda Free Light Chains (FLCs), Troponin,NT-ProBNP, Temperature, Blood Pressure, Heart Rate and Weight. Oncewe understood that these critical parameters were indicative ofLyall’s future health, we took responsibility to track them andproactively took quick action &/or asked for advice/help from hismedical team when it was clear something was trending off-track.

    I just want tore-iterate this, because it is really important, if a healthparameter is going off-track, or a new symptom develops, don’t waitto see what happens, act FAST and ask for advice/help. If somethingreally is wrong, there is a much better chance of recovery if it isidentified and treated early.

    In October 2015Lyall started his first chemotherapy regime with Velcade(tm), also referred to as CyBorD. It was administered byintravenous infusion, treatment continued through to late December2015. During that time, the regime was successful at reducing hisFLCs down from 65mg/L to 32mg/L (normal is between 5.7 - 26mg/L). His levels weren’t quite within normal range yet, but they were atleast heading in the right direction, so in early January theyproceeded to collect his Stem Cells in preparation for his Stem CellTransplant which was scheduled for later that same month.

    Despite loweredFLCs, his heart parameters were still deteriorating. Two mainparameters being followed were NT-ProBNP and Troponin, both wereescalating well above normal range. Overall, his cardiac health wasdeemed too poor for him to survive a Stem Cell Transplant procedure,so in late January 2016 the procedure was cancelled. The only wayforward was to pursue further chemo treatments and hope his hearthealth would improve at which time they would reconsider proceedingwith the Stem Cell transplant.

    During a month breakfrom chemo it was hoped the Velcade regime would continue to reducehis FLC levels, or at least hold them steady for a while, butunfortunately his FLCs shot back up to 64mg/L – well above normal. Given this regime did not ‘hold’, and the heart parameters werenot improving, a different regime of Melphalan would be administeredto see if it would work any better.

    After one month itwas clear the Melphalan regime was not dropping his FLCs down much atall, and we were given the choice to try it a little longer, orrevert back to the Velcade regime to quickly get his FLCs back tonormal. We decided to revert back to Velcade, this time it wasadministered by subcutaneous injections into the stomach. Afteranother three weeks his FLCs were still not dropping so Thalidamidewas added to the Velcade regime and they also changed it to beadministered by intravenous infusion instead of subcutaneousinjections into the stomach.

    By late March 2016tingles in the feet & hands started developing along with dizzyspells & puffy skin from fluid retention in the body (oedema). The dizzy spells were most noticeable when transitioning from lyingdown to standing. We since learnt these are typical symptoms ofneuropathy & the oedema is typical for patients withheart-failure.

    In early April 2016his FLCs had successfully reduced to 23mg/L, within normal range. Wecontinued with this chemo regime though end June 2016. However, hisheart parameters (Troponin & NT-ProBNP) were not improving makinga Stem Cell Transplant further and further out of reach. We neededto find a treatment that would not only help control his blood cancerbut would help his heart too.

    Given Lyall’scondition crossed two disciplines of medicine, Hematology for thebone/blood cancer, and Cardiology for heart failure, it was becominga delicate juggle on how to treat and medicate both. There weren’tany regimes on the PBS List to help remove or reduce depositedamyloids from the blood or heart. Lyall’s options for treatmentwere becoming limited.

    We asked about thepossibility of a heart transplant in the future should his heartcontinue to deteriorate, but we were told at this time it was not anoption as treatment with traditional Chemotherapy was an ExclusionCriteria for Heart Transplant patients; most chemotherapy medicationsinterfere with the immunosuppressant medications used to preventorgan rejection after transplants. Further, Lyall’s blood cancerwould probably eventually infiltrate and damage the new heart too. So, for Lyall’s condition, based on the treatments available at thetime, this was not an option. It made sense, we understood why, andat that time as hard as it was we accepted it, but it was trulydevastating trying to accept the finality of it all.

    Despite Lyall’spoor prognosis, we knew the technological developments in thismedical field were moving fast – so there was still hope. Weneeded to refocus on the hope, push-on and keep exploring options.

    In mid-April 2016some online research uncovered a promising Clinical Trial reportabout the use of antibiotics, specifically Doxycycline, where itdisrupted amyloid production by preventing fibril (amyloid)formation. We asked his medical team about it and they agreed it wasworth a try, so Lyall started taking Doxycycline too in addition tohis chemo regime.

    In May 2016 Lyallhad a set-back, he presented to the Emergency Ward with an elevatedtemperature and feeling weak. The big lesson for us here, we waitedtoo long to seek medical attention when a key parameter wentoff-track. He was admitted to ICU with Viral Pneumonia. DuringMay/June his heart parameters deteriorated significantly. HisNT-ProBNP skyrocketed reaching over 17,000 ng/L (normal is less than900 ng/L). Lyall’s heart Ejection Fraction dropped to 32%, meaningonly 32% of the total amount of blood in his heart’s left ventriclewas being pushed out with each heartbeat (Normal is greater than55%). However, to our surprise his Troponin levels dropped back intothe normal range, and his FLC levels dropped significantly down to6mg/L, on the low-end of Normal scale too, which meant chemo could bestopped for a little while; a break from chemo his body reallyneeded.

    By this time, end ofJune 2016, Lyall’s tingly fingers & feet had developed intofull numbness of limbs below the knees and numbness in the hands,including loss of ability to feel the difference between hot &cold. His dizzy spells had developed into regular and problematicblackouts with his baseline blood pressure now consistentlydangerously low. He was diagnosed with both peripheral &autonomic neuropathy, the latter causing postural hypotension, whichis when the body becomes unable to self-regulate blood pressure sowhen he stood up from a lying-down or seated position, his bloodpressure couldn’t auto-correct quickly enough to sustain adequateblood to the brain, so he would blackout and collapse. Fortunately,they could medicate to help raise his baseline Blood Pressure to helpreduce the blackouts, but there was nothing they could do to helpwith the numbness in the limbs. Velcade & Thalidamide could nolonger be used for Chemo due to these adverse side-effects. We hadto find another treatment.

    While he was on abreak from Chemo we took stock of our options, I knuckled down anddid more research. I called almost all the Amyloidosis Centresthroughout Australia and the USA, including the Stanford AmyloidCenter and Mayo Amyloid Clinic in Minnesota, asking for educationalliterature & advice. I read abstracts & papers from bothClinical Trials and medical conventions specialisingin Amyloidosis treatments & future developments. The mostpromising treatment found from this research was daratumumab(Darzalex), it was the first monoclonal antibody approved for use inmultiple myeloma, and a small Clinical Trial in the USA showed reallygood results for Cardiac (AL) Amyloidosis patients. PreliminaryTrials were showing a Haematological Response rate for Single Agentdaratumumab of 90% (n=18, CR=6, VGPR=3, PR=7, NR=2)1,2compared to most other agents that barely reached 70%. We approachedLyall’s medical team requesting we try daratumumab, they advisedthey had been monitoring the development of this new treatment too,but unfortunately, daratumumab was only available in the USA and notavailable in Australia yet. Our team agreed to continue to closelymonitor daratumumab’s entry into the Australian market, but weneeded to find something else for now instead. We briefly consideredtravelling to the USA for treatment with daratumumab, but it wasclear this would be cost prohibitive (that’s a whole other story)and most likely a poor quality of life choice with Lyall beingseparated from family & friends. Our remaining choices withinAustralia were to either select another Amyloidosis treatment regimefrom the PBS List, or find a Clinical Trial for a new treatmentregime. My research continued.

    The next best thingwe found was a Clinical Trial for a new promising monoclonal antibodytreatment called PRONTO NEOD001. It was specifically for treatment ofCardiac (AL) Amyloidosis. Preliminary results showed it hadpotential to stop formation and even remove amyloid deposits from theblood and heart. The medical team agreed to help us pursue thisClinical Trial and helped us work through the process.

    Over the next fewmonths Lyall’s FLC’s were fortunately holding firm in the normalrange, so the pressure was off to find another quick Chemotherapysolution. Instead, this gave his medical team time to get things setup for the NEOD001 Trial which was being managed in Melbourne. Ittook many months of paperwork, interviews & preliminary medicaltests to qualify for the Clinical Trial and much time and effortinvested by both his Adelaide medical team and the Clinical Trialteam in Melbourne to coordinate everything.

    While we waited forthe approvals to participate in the PRONTO Clinical Trial, wecontinued our research and we found another medication called EGCG. It showed promising preliminary Clinical Trial results to help removeamyloid deposits. Given EGCG was readily available, we asked hismedical team if we could try it while we waited to get approvals backfrom the PRONTO team. Although they were against it and erring onthe edge of saying ‘no’, they finally relented and agreed to letus try it as an interim treatment. (In hindsight, they were right,the EGCG regime did not help Lyall’s condition at all).

    After much waiting,in early January 2017 Lyall was invited to travel to Melbourne by thePRONTO NEOD001 team for his final interview and medical tests, thelast step to quality for the Clinical Trial. We were excited. Reports were showing good preliminary results and it was wonderful tohave hope again. Lyall’s FLC levels had crept up over the last fewmonths and was bordering the top-end of the normal range, so it wasperfect timing for the PRONTO NEOD001 regime to commence. But wereturned from Melbourne without qualifying for the trial due to asilly mix-up on our end. We were told Lyall was to stop taking ALLmedications for 6 weeks prior to this interview, but we interpretedit as to stop taking Chemotherapy. Although Lyall had beenchemotherapy free for months, he had still been taking EGCG andDoxycycline, which disqualified him. This was a BIG lesson for us;to make sure we clearly cross-matched medications, one-by-one, withhis medical team regularly to ensure we were using the rightmedications & doses. Although Lyall missed out this time, he wasinvited to qualify in 6 weeks’ time if the last spot in theClinical Trial had not been filled by someone else. In mid-Februaryhe travelled back to Melbourne again, this time he qualified and wasapproved to participate in the Trial. Two weeks later (early March2017) he was given his first infusion which had a 50/50 chance ofbeing either NEOD001 or a Placebo. It was a randomized, double-blindtrial, so we would never know if he was being given NEOD001 of thePlacebo. Risky, yes, but with virtually no other options offeringreal hope, it was worth the risk at that time.

    Ever since Lyall wasdiagnosed, to keep ourselves up-to-date on the medical industrydevelopments to treat Lyall’s condition, we signed up to receiveemail updates, newsletters and media alerts from variousorganisations, institutions, foundations & medical manufacturerswho specialized in Amyloidosis. These updates were particularlyuseful. In July 2017 we received an email alert advising us thatdaratumumab had now been approved for use in Australia on the basisof Compassionate Access only (but it was still not on the PBS). Atthe time, Lyall’s FLC’s and amyloid deposits were not showing anysigns of improvement from 4 months of treatment on the NEOD001 trial,so this alert on daratumumab was a new sign of hope. We immediatelyreached out to his medical team, stating we still wanted to pursuedaratumumab as a high priority, and asked what needed to happen nextto get the ball rolling. His team reported they were aware of theannouncement and they had already commenced correspondence with themanufacturer and discussions were in progress, but it would taketime.

    By mid-September2017 Lyall was still deteriorating, and his FLC levels were stillincreasing at a steady rate and were now well above normal. He optedto abandon the PRONTO NEOD001 clinical trial and as a stopgap herecommenced Doxycycline & EGCG until another chemo regime couldcommence.

    Looking at theremaining chemo regimes that were left for Lyall to try on theAustralian PBS list, it was quite disheartening as they were allderivates of treatments he’d tried in the past which were risky dueto adverse side-affects, or they were derivatives of treatments thathad not worked. In desperation, knowing daratumumab was now inAustralia, and it wasn’t clear the status of getting Lyall accessto it, I reached out for help to the medical manufacturer directly,the hospital, various local, state & national health ministers. I let his medical team know my actions and they promised they werestill vigorously pursuing access to daratumumab and it would still bea long road ahead before we could get it, but the wheels were slowlyturning and progressing. We just needed to wait and hope we couldget it before it was too late. We had to find something else in themeantime.

    In early October2017 he stopped EGCG & started a new low-dose regime of chemocalled Lenalidomide (Revlimid). The new regime was one of very fewleft on the PBS List, all of which were undesirable based on Lyall’smedical history. Fortunately, it successfully lowered Lyall’s freelight chains down to normal levels within a couple of weeks and hisside-affects were minimal. In November 2017 chemo was intentionallypaused to see if these low FLC levels would ‘hold’. They didn’t. This was incredibly upsetting as this meant Revlimid was not goingto be sustainable for Lyall for very long. Revlimid was re-startedat half the low-dose in hope it would buy us more time, and it wasback to the drawing board to determine what regime to try next. Inthe background, his medical team continued to pursue getting accessto daratumumab.

    By December 2017Lyall’s FLCs had slowly crept up to above normal levels again andby June 2018 it was clear they were going to continue rising. Halfthe low-dose Revlimid was no longer sustainable and an increase indose was too risky due to adverse side-effects. In June 2018 Lyalltook his last dose of the Revlimid chemo regime.

    In mid July 2018 toour complete surprise, Lyall’s medical team announced they hadfinally secured special access to daratumamab (Darzalex) and thatsame week he had his first infusion. Within 3 weeks his FLC levelsdropped back to normal. Lyall has been on daratumumab ever since(its now February 2021 as I write this article) and his FLCs havebeen maintained at normal levels with no other adverse side-effects. He also continues to take Doxycycline.

    Back to late 2018,although on a Haematological basis Lyall’s FLCs were now beingmaintained at normal levels using daratumamab, and by definition inmedical terms he was (and still is) considered to be in ‘remission’, but it is still the view of his medical team he still has cancer andtreatment needs to continue. Even though his FLCs are at normallevels, its still unknown what percentage of these FLCs are ‘faulty’and could still be misfolding into amyloids and subsequentlydepositing in his heart. Lowering the FLC levels in the blood couldsimply be lowering the ‘rate’ of amyloid depositing in the heart. Its incredibly hard to measure.

    Even though Lyall’sFLCs levels had been stabilized, his heart was now too severely andirreversibly damaged and Congestive Heart Failure was stillprogressing. In late 2018 we needed to shift gears and move ourfocus from the Hematology discipline and start focusing heavily onthe Cardiology side of things. Back to research, asking lots ofquestions & more self-education. There were so many differentheart devices and aids that can be used to assist cardiac patients. Lyall’s medical team helped us understand all the options availableto Lyall to potentially improve his heart condition. In February2019 Lyall had heart surgery to have a bi-ventricular deviceinstalled.

    By December 2019Lyall was still stabilized on a haematological front with normal FLClevels, but his heart condition was still deteriorating with hisEjection Fraction getting worse. His fluid retention (oedema)becoming almost unmanageable at home, requiring frequent in-patienthospital care and he was experiencing constant low blood pressure andblackouts were becoming more and more frequent. Again, we startedasking his medical team for possible options moving forward. What dowe do now?

    The biggest questionwe asked was associated to a Heart Transplant. We knew that Lyallwas previously excluded from a Heart Transplant because hischemotherapy medications would interfere with the immunosuppressantmedications used to prevent organ rejection after the transplant. But Lyall was no longer on chemotherapy medications, instead he wasnow on a new monoclonal antibody regime (daratumumab). Would themonoclonal antibody interfere with the transplant immunosuppressantmedications too? If not, does that open the door for Lyall to now beconsidered for a Heart Transplant? Also, knowing that his FLCs havebeen maintained at normal levels now for a significant time (1.5years), medical remission, does this also change things with regardsto qualifying for a Heart Transplant? His medical team said this nowlies in a ‘grey area’ and would need to be assessed on acase-by-case basis. Again, Lyall’s medical team agreed these weregood questions and promised they would source answers, but likebefore it may take some time.

    Time passed, Lyallstruggled through and was still deteriorating from Congestive HeartFailure. Then in early 2020 Lyall was approached by his medical teamwith an offer to participate in a Clinical Trial for “Orthotopicheart transplantation followed by autologous stem celltransplantation in patients with cardiac AL amyloidosis - a Phase IIstudy”. Words can’t explain our relief – once again there wasrenewed hope. Over a period of about 2 months, all the preliminarymedical tests were done to determine whether he would qualify for theHeart Transplant & Stem Cell Transplant (HT/SC) Clinical Trial. Many medical tests later and several trips to Sydney for interviews,he was told he qualified. We were advised he was now added to theHeart Transplant waitlist. What an incredible turn of events.

    In May/June 2020Lyall’s hospital visits became so frequent due to unmanageablefluid retention and blackouts that he was spending more time inhospital than at home. By mid-June he was deemed to have anunmanageable cardiac condition by Royal Adelaide Hospital and he wasMedivac’d from Adelaide to Sydney for more specialized treatment atthe St Vincent's Hospitalwhich is a leader in Cardiac Medical Services & Care.

    At the end of June2020, Lyall’s heart could no longer pump enough blood through hisbody to sustain him and some of his other organs started to fail. With his heart being abnormally shaped and with very thick walls,traditional cardiac aids to improve his condition would require novelsurgery and was deemed too risky. Instead, Lyall became the firstperson in Australia to have a tiny temporary pump called an Impella,installed inside his heart to help boost his blood flow to keep himalive while he continued to wait for a donor heart. The life-savingImpella surgery sustained Lyall for 4 days until he received a HeartTransplant on 1st July 2020.

    Once we were adviseda donor heart had become available, everything happened so fast. Theemotions were overwhelming; gratitude, relief & joy this day hadfinally come, fear & worry of what could go wrong and theunknown, grief & sadnessknowing another family’s lives had tragically changed forever.

    The Heart Transplantsurgery itself only took 5 hours. Lyall was conscious again within24 hours following surgery, and with help he was able to stand-up andwalk a few steps within a couple of days. His recovery over the nextweek was incredible to watch and much faster than I ever imagined.

    But then into thesecond week of recovery we had a major set-back, he started to feeloff-colour, brain fog and confusion, difficulty with handmotor-skills (dropping things), balance, weak, affected vision (hesaw sparkly little worms in the clouds) and he had a few unusualheart-beat events (fibrillation). A few days after he had anexternal pacemaker removed he collapsed. His medical team actedincredibly fast and he was in open heart surgery within minutes tofix the problem. He had suffered an internal bleed in his chestcavity which caused a Cardiac Tamponade event; where the blood filledhis chest cavity, pressurised it, and the pressure caused his newheart to fail.

    His recovery startedover and again. He was conscious within 24 hours of the secondsurgery. But this time, something was slightly different, his speechwas slow, somewhat simple and disjointed. Then he’d snap out of itand speak normally, then he’d revert back and speak slow again. Ididn’t think anything of it at first and put it down to ‘recovery’,but after a quick consultation with family we felt it critical to letthe medical team know in case he’d had a TIA (mini stroke). Theyacted immediately and he went through many tests. They all came backclear, no evidence of a stroke.

    But his behaviourwas still not normal and it was getting worse. Confusion, speech,vision, hearing, motor-skills were all being affected in waves. Forone hour he’d be ok, then for 1-2 hours he’d fall into a statewhere he could not function & he was reporting that he was inpain. Then he’d snap out of it and be normal, no pain. The cyclecontinued and the episodes became longer and worse. Specialists werequickly brought in from many disciplines throughout the hospital toassess and run tests to rule out various potentially debilitatingdiseases, viruses and disorders. All tests came back clear. It wasduring this time, when he had lost his ability to effectivelycommunicate, where I felt I was advocating for him the most. KnowingLyall’s normal behaviour, it was easy for me to see when there wasimprovement, deterioration, change &/or new symptoms. Often, Iwould see changes quicklyand could raise the red flag early. His nurses & carers couldn’tto do this, because they didn’t know Lyall and couldn’tdifferentiate normal behaviour from abnormal. I would try to makesure I was visiting Lyall during the times the Doctors would do theirrounds, and I would respectfully give my bedside observations to hismedical team & try to keep updated on his progress and nextsteps. They in turn would help guide me on behavioural things towatch-out for and what to take seriously and what to ignore. Hismedical team made me feel like an important part of their team andoften acted, ordered tests, if I’d raised a concern about a newsymptom. They listened to my concerns and briefly looked at my dailynotes (I’d have to keep these brief otherwise they wouldn’t readthem through). After all serious diseases, viruses, disorders andneurological conditions were ruled out, he was diagnosed withDelirium. It then became a challenge to determine what was causing itso they could pull him out of it. Every day they changed somethingto see if it would help and I’d provide bedside feedback on whetherit had made a difference or not. Then the next day they’d tryagain, and again, and again. One evening when I was looking backthrough all my notes, it occurred to me that his condition started todeteriorate about the same time they had changed one of hisanti-rejection medications, which happened several days prior to hisCardiac Tamponade event. I read the symptoms of possible allergicreactions to this medication, and they seemed similar to what Lyallwas experiencing. By this time is was 2am, so I phoned the hospitaland reported this to the Doctor on Duty, then met with his normalmedical team the following morning to discuss further. By that time,they had already changed his anti-rejection medication, they’d alsoordered infusions of immunoglobulin as well as a few other minormedicine changes. The following morning, I walked into see Lyall,and to my complete surprise he was sitting up in his bed playingcards and simply said “Hi V”. He’d totally come out of hisDelirium. To this day his medical team are still not sure whatcaused it, there are several theories and differences of opinions,but ultimately they believe it was a chemical imbalance in the brainthat could have been a result of his new medications (or combinationthereof) and his compromised immune system. It took three weeks forhim to fully recover. Lyall doesn’t remember the Delirium, herefers to this period of time as his visit to “La La Land”; oneday his fingernails were short, the next day he woke-up and they werelong.

    Seeing a loved onego through this was totally heart wrenching and incredibly scary. Itwas made worse being in the middle of Covid and having all theborders closed which stopped other family members from travelling tohelp support us. But the medical professionals never gave up andkept giving me hope that they would work it out. And they did.

    After weeks of rehabfor severe muscle atrophy Lyall was discharged from hospital. He wasrequired to stay locally in Sydney as an outpatient until he’dcompletely stabilised on theanti-rejection medication and been given the green-light to travelhome to Adelaide. That green-light came at the end of October 2020,a few weeks after the border between NSW & SA had reopened. Perfect timing to avoid complications of Quarantine.

    Upon returning toAdelaide Lyall was able to settle back into his own house &routine with his family and continue focusing on rehab. We had alovely Christmas together with all our extended family. Then inJanuary 2021 the preparations ramped up for his next procedure, theAutologous Stem Cell Transplant.

    As I write thisarticle (its mid February 2021) Lyall is still in hospital and isalmost 2 weeks into the Stem Cell Transplant procedure. As I didbefore, I elected to travel with Lyall to Sydney as his advocate. This whole procedure has again been tough on Lyall as a patient,simply because it makes people feel so sick and weak. But we knew itwould be hard for him going into the procedure. Despite Lyallfeeling so sick, everything has gone to plan so far without any majorcomplications. I visit Lyall morning and night and try to keep trackas best I can on the parameters that are important and keep hisfamily updated in Adelaide. If I need help understanding something,I ask his nurse or medical team questions. But I make sure to bepolite, not too demanding, non-judgemental and sensitive to theirtime as often they have a lot on their plate, and I don’t want tobecome a nuisance. My intent is to advocate, support and help –not to make life difficult or unpleasant for anyone. We are allthere for the same reason, to help Lyall. If I see something thatconcerns me, I alert a member of his medical team. If I know anon-routine procedure or medication is scheduled, I follow-up to makesure the wheels are turning and its on track to occur. If I suspectsomething has been overlooked or missed, I alert someone – just incase. We’re all only human after all and we need to have eachother’s back, help each other for the good of our common goal.

    Lyall’s on therecovery side of the curve now, with his immune system ramping upproduction of new white blood cells from his Stem Cells that wereharvested back in January 2016. He is scheduled to be released fromhospital in two days, followed by another two weeks in Sydney as anout-patient under observations before he is cleared to travel backhome to Adelaide.

    Lyall’s overalljourney has entailed a large range of different treatment options,with varying degrees of success, including participating in multipleClinical Trials. These leading-edge medical developments offeredhope at times when there were no other treatment options availableand fortunately for us several of them delivered. From Lyall’sendeavours over the last 5 years, support from his advocates, andfrom an incredible & progressive team of medical experts, he’smade it through and potentially forged new pathways for successfultreatment of others who have the same diagnosis. An extended life,long term maintenance of his condition, and even a cure is now a realpossibility.



    To have Lyall stillwith us today in our view is a medical miracle. I can’t explainthe emotions felt by our family and how grateful we are – therejust aren’t any words.





    GRAPHS:










    ABBREVIATIONS:


    CR
    Complete Response (Hematologic Response to Treatment Regime).Measured in Number of Patients in the Study.
    FLCs
    Lambda Free Light Chains, proteins made by plasma cells, a type ofwhite blood cell.
    HT
    Heart Transplant
    n
    Number of Patients in the Study
    NT-ProBNP
    Is a hormone produced by your heart which is relates to hearthealth and can detect heart failure & other cardiac problems.
    NR
    No Response (Hematologic Response to Treatment Regime). Measuredin Number of Patients in the Study.
    PR
    Partial Response (Hematologic Response to Treatment Regime).Measured in Number of Patients in the Study.
    ST
    Stem Cell
    Troponin
    Proteins relating to heart contractions & muscles. Hightroponin levels can indicate a problem with the heart.
    VGPR
    Very Good Partial Response (Hematologic Response to TreatmentRegime). Measured in Number of Patients in the Study.





    REFERENCES:


    1. Daratumumab Produces DramaticResponses in Relapsed Light Chain Amyloidosis

    Published Online:Monday, Sep 12, 2016

    Gregory P. Kaufman, MD,Hematology at Stanford University

    Source:http://www.onclive.com/web-exclusives/daratumumab-produces-dramatic-responses-in-relapsed-light-chain-amyloidosis#sthash.UzxhIxNy.dpuf

    1. Hematologic Responses andCardiac Organ Improvement in Patients with Heavily PretreatedCardiac Immunoglobulin Light Chain (AL) Amyloidosis ReceivingDaratumumab

    58th ASH Annual Meeting& Exposition, San Diego, December 3-6, 2016

    Myeloma: Therapy,excluding Transplantation

    Program: Oral andPoster Abstracts

    Gregory Kaufman, MD1,Ronald Witteles, MD2*, Matthew Wheeler, MD3*, Patricia Ulloa, RN4*,Marie Lugtu, RN4*, Sally Arai, MD5, Stanley Schrier, MD6, RichardLafayette, MD7* and Michaela Liedtke, MD6

    Source:https://ash.confex.com/ash/2016/webprogram/Paper98185.html

  • Cancer Services down South needs help!

    by Mon, over 3 years ago
    I work in Flinders Cancer Clinic, the only Major public oncology service down south.


    We are grossly understaffed and can not get approval for more FTE for consultants - in fact we are losing consultants and new patient spots.

    We have patients that require urgent review and cancer treatment planning after diagnosis, and these patients can sometimes wait weeks to months. We are not meeting standards of seeing patients within time frames because of staff shortage.


    The shortage of doctors to see the patients is just part of the problem. We have expanded our chemotherapy unit to include more beds... Continue reading

    I work in Flinders Cancer Clinic, the only Major public oncology service down south.


    We are grossly understaffed and can not get approval for more FTE for consultants - in fact we are losing consultants and new patient spots.

    We have patients that require urgent review and cancer treatment planning after diagnosis, and these patients can sometimes wait weeks to months. We are not meeting standards of seeing patients within time frames because of staff shortage.


    The shortage of doctors to see the patients is just part of the problem. We have expanded our chemotherapy unit to include more beds, and have also opened on a Saturday, but we can still not keep up with demand.

    A cancer diagnosis is an already stressful time for a patient, a delay in seeing an Oncologist just adds to this distress.


  • Group hydrotherapy for people with cancer

    by Glenys Williams, over 3 years ago
    I am an Accredited Exercise Physiologist working in a rural community in South Australia. One of the local cancer support groups contacted me about providing a weekly exercise session in a hydrotherapy setting for their members. This group is taken through a physical activity routine that covers cardiovascular endurance, upper body and lower body strength, core strength and balance, in a gentle, warm environment that enables low stress movement. Many people undergoing cancer have physical complexities, and stressful lives, and this exercise modality achieves an increase in physical activity participation, as well as taking into consideration their physical issues, and... Continue reading
    I am an Accredited Exercise Physiologist working in a rural community in South Australia. One of the local cancer support groups contacted me about providing a weekly exercise session in a hydrotherapy setting for their members. This group is taken through a physical activity routine that covers cardiovascular endurance, upper body and lower body strength, core strength and balance, in a gentle, warm environment that enables low stress movement. Many people undergoing cancer have physical complexities, and stressful lives, and this exercise modality achieves an increase in physical activity participation, as well as taking into consideration their physical issues, and provision of a safe, calm environment for exercise. The group initially was done for 10 week periods, but have recently committed to weekly sessions indefinitely.
  • Exercise for improved mobility and comfort following breast cancer surgery

    by ClaireNeylon, over 3 years ago
    I work as an Accredited Exercise Physiologist in a community setting. I want to share a story about a lady who came to see me a year post breast cancer treatment. She had had a bilateral breast tissue and lymph node removal and radiation, and as a result reasonable scar tissue across her chest. This scar tissue was causing her significant pain and restriction and causing other musculoskeletal problems with pain in her upper back and shoulders. After two sessions with her in a 1:1 exercise physiology setting and sending her home with a tailored home exercise program she experienced... Continue reading
    I work as an Accredited Exercise Physiologist in a community setting. I want to share a story about a lady who came to see me a year post breast cancer treatment. She had had a bilateral breast tissue and lymph node removal and radiation, and as a result reasonable scar tissue across her chest. This scar tissue was causing her significant pain and restriction and causing other musculoskeletal problems with pain in her upper back and shoulders. After two sessions with her in a 1:1 exercise physiology setting and sending her home with a tailored home exercise program she experienced a significant improvement in chest and shoulder range of movement and reduction in pain and discomfort. 1 year post cancer treatment with was living with the longer term effects of her treatment and needed ongoing support and intervention to improve quality of life. I wanted to share this to ensure we have strategies and referral/funding pathways in place to support people post treatment and that people are educated as to options they have for conservative management of these side effects.
  • Mammograms aren’t always the best diagnostic tool

    by Trudie Cain, over 3 years ago

    I was diagnosed with breast cancer 4yrs ago. Once a yr my specialist wants me to have a mammogram or MRI. I choose an MRI as I detest mammograms as I feel they are so degrading and painful.
    A technician handles your breast into place, you are required to stand in a ridiculous position and then cold hard plates squash sensitive tissue.
    Whereas with an MRI there is more dignity.
    An MRI also gives a better diagnostic picture of my breasts.
    The downside is I can’t claim with Medicare or my health fund. Luckily I can afford to pay but... Continue reading

    I was diagnosed with breast cancer 4yrs ago. Once a yr my specialist wants me to have a mammogram or MRI. I choose an MRI as I detest mammograms as I feel they are so degrading and painful.
    A technician handles your breast into place, you are required to stand in a ridiculous position and then cold hard plates squash sensitive tissue.
    Whereas with an MRI there is more dignity.
    An MRI also gives a better diagnostic picture of my breasts.
    The downside is I can’t claim with Medicare or my health fund. Luckily I can afford to pay but what about people who can’t.
    I have been told that MRIs are only claimable when a mammogram and ultrasounds results are inconclusive. Isn’t this a waste of money and people’s time?

  • Cancer story

    by VickiT, over 3 years ago

    I write to you regarding the Cancer Care Services available to patients in the Country Health Local Health Networks, specifically the Riverland General Hospital.

    I understand that in 2018 there was an announcement to implement an upgrade to the Cancer Care Services at Country Health LHNs of $6.9m over 4 years, including Riverland General Hospital to medium level, however, I ask that consideration be given to upgrade the service to high level.

    In 2017 a report conducted by Torrens University Australia revealed that Renmark topped the list of all cancers, 43% above the national average. The results of a study... Continue reading

    I write to you regarding the Cancer Care Services available to patients in the Country Health Local Health Networks, specifically the Riverland General Hospital.

    I understand that in 2018 there was an announcement to implement an upgrade to the Cancer Care Services at Country Health LHNs of $6.9m over 4 years, including Riverland General Hospital to medium level, however, I ask that consideration be given to upgrade the service to high level.

    In 2017 a report conducted by Torrens University Australia revealed that Renmark topped the list of all cancers, 43% above the national average. The results of a study such as this would warrant a high-level oncology treatment available for Riverland patients. The benefits would be enormous for patients, their families and the support networks. The upgraded service would also provide extra jobs in the Riverland for clinical staff and allied health services. Cancer patients who have to travel from the Riverland to Adelaide for oncology appointments and treatment places a lot of burden on the patient and their support networks. There is accommodation and transport to arrange, then transport from the accommodation to the hospital and back again. Often the timing of appointments does not line up with free transport so there is added cost and more coordination of services. This can be an exhausting process for patients who are already going through a stressful time that could be alleviated by having the appropriate care provided in their home environment that is familiar and removes that extra burden of organisation, cost and being in unfamiliar surroundings.

    I have three family members; my father, his brother and his daughter from Renmark who have had cancer (two deceased) and have had to endure the extra stress of travelling to Adelaide for treatment. It is a three hour drive each way and often involves one or more nights away from home, putting extra pressure on the cancer patient, families and friends. In the case of my father it was the thought of this extra burden that was a factor in deciding to end his treatment for pancreatic cancer.

    My cousin recently had treatment for breast cancer at the Lyell McEwin Hospital which is extremely inconvenient in terms of accommodation as the Lyell McEwin Hospital is in the northern suburbs with limited access to accommodation. The inconvenience is exacerbated by the fact that the oncologist appointments were often made early in the morning on the day of treatment, therefore an extra night away from home was required. With the appointment being early in the day, my cousin often needed to wait for several hours at the hospital before treatment, with the added risk of infection. The appointments with oncologists before treatment is another factor for having a high-level cancer care unit in the Riverland, as consideration is not given for country patients who must travel for the appointment.

    The travel and disruption to the lives of patients, friends and family adds more stress and cost to an already traumatic situation for everyone involved. Not to mention the added risk of road traffic accidents with patients and or their family driving long hours in an emotional state.

    I ask that you consider the recommendation for a high care facility in the Riverland.

  • ALL - from diagnosis to gone in the week from hell!

    by Leize, over 3 years ago

    My beautiful, fit, sporty 23 yo son thought he had a cold and after a week, went to his GP. 'It might be a virus, come back in a week if no improvement'. A week later he was admitted to hospital and diagnosed with leukaemia, 5 days later he was moved to ICU and 2 days after that he died. In ICU, his nurse went for a break and he began hallucinating, thinking we were pulling an April Fools prank and began to pull out the leads connecting him to the monitors. We tried to hold him down and called... Continue reading

    My beautiful, fit, sporty 23 yo son thought he had a cold and after a week, went to his GP. 'It might be a virus, come back in a week if no improvement'. A week later he was admitted to hospital and diagnosed with leukaemia, 5 days later he was moved to ICU and 2 days after that he died. In ICU, his nurse went for a break and he began hallucinating, thinking we were pulling an April Fools prank and began to pull out the leads connecting him to the monitors. We tried to hold him down and called for help but the nurse in the bay next to us was barrier nursing her patient and she couldn't come. This was so frightening. I haven't found any other stories of people with leukaemia dying so quickly - there seems to be treatments to try and months to say goodbye. Years later, a haematology oncologist told me that he probably didn't die from the leukaemia?? Then what was it - we can only know what the hospital tells us??

  • Diagnosed Metastatic Prostate Cancer in 2021.

    by Martin Castilla, over 3 years ago

    I was diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer early in 2021, so immediately began hormone therapy. In August 2021 I started 6 rounds of chemotherapy 3 weeks apart (hence over 18 weeks), which was totally successful - scans at the end of treatment could not detect any presence of cancer cells(!). My oncologist stated it was 'a minor miracle'.


    Throughout the treatment - and still to this day - I was under the care of integrative GPs and a naturopath, who prescribed an extensive and individually tailored nutritional regime which included high dose vitamin infusions, glutathione, zinc, magnesium, melatonin, CBD/THC, mushroom... Continue reading

    I was diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer early in 2021, so immediately began hormone therapy. In August 2021 I started 6 rounds of chemotherapy 3 weeks apart (hence over 18 weeks), which was totally successful - scans at the end of treatment could not detect any presence of cancer cells(!). My oncologist stated it was 'a minor miracle'.


    Throughout the treatment - and still to this day - I was under the care of integrative GPs and a naturopath, who prescribed an extensive and individually tailored nutritional regime which included high dose vitamin infusions, glutathione, zinc, magnesium, melatonin, CBD/THC, mushroom extract etc. to support my body to withstand the chemo, and to beef up my immune system.


    In January this year it was recommended I also undertake a course of radiotherapy to 'mop up' remaining disease, which I completed in February.

    This month, following routine blood tests which showed a very slightly elevated PSA reading then a PET scan, a new lesion was discovered on my hip. In consultation with the oncologist and radiotherapy oncologist we decided to simply continue with the nutritional regime and closely monitor the lesion every 3 months ongoing.

  • Fighting cancer and fighting the system

    by Ckriddle06 , over 3 years ago

    My story should’ve been different. There is a strong family history of breast cancer in my family, the most recent case was my mum at age 53. My dad‘s mum died from it, along with 2 of her sisters. My dad’s cousin had it as well as her daughter.

    My sisters were provided with regular screening with a breast surgeon when my mum was diagnosed with breast cancer but because I was only 26 I wasn’t included in the screening. I found a lump during my first pregnancy at 28 and saw a breast surgeon who told me it was... Continue reading

    My story should’ve been different. There is a strong family history of breast cancer in my family, the most recent case was my mum at age 53. My dad‘s mum died from it, along with 2 of her sisters. My dad’s cousin had it as well as her daughter.

    My sisters were provided with regular screening with a breast surgeon when my mum was diagnosed with breast cancer but because I was only 26 I wasn’t included in the screening. I found a lump during my first pregnancy at 28 and saw a breast surgeon who told me it was hormonal.

    I had numerous breast lumps over the years that were always deemed hormonal but with my family history I went to see a GP to see if I could be tested for the BRCA gene. I was told I couldn’t because I needed a current family member to have it and thankfully my mum was cancer free. I was prepared to pay the exorbitant cost of the test but couldn’t even get referred to a genetic counsellor.

    Fast forward 8 years at 43 and I felt another lump. I‘d had my first mammogram 6 months earlier which was clear but went to the GP who did a breast check and told me it was nothing. I insisted on an ultrasound which the GP begrudgingly ordered along with another mammogram. The mammogram was clear but the ultrasound on the same day showed a suspicious lump. The fine needle biopsy confirmed breast cancer. The GP broke the news by saying “well that was a surprise wasn’t it?” She couldn’t even say the words “You have cancer.” I had to actually ask her “so does that mean it’s cancer?”. Sufficed to say I haven’t stepped back in her office.

    I went through the public health system where I have worked for over 25 years and was told I had to wait 3 weeks to see a breast surgeon. That is 3 weeks of absolute hell not knowing what your future holds so I paid privately to see the same surgeon and got in 1 week earlier. The surgeon encouraged me to have a lumpectomy. I said I wanted a double mastectomy. He said “do you how many women walk in here and say that when they don’t actually need it?” He told me it wasn’t necessary and I told him with my family history that I didn’t want to take any more risks. He also begrudgingly agreed. Post mastectomy I asked for the BRCA test and he told me only 5-10% of breast cancers were genetic. Again I pushed and again he begrudgingly agreed.

    The test came back BRCA 2 positive. Thankfully I had already had a double mastectomy and chemo but my risk wasn’t over. With the new diagnosis my amazing oncologist was happy to refer me to a gynaecologist to discuss having my ovaries, fallopian tubes, uterus and cervix removed. This doctor was also great and immediately agreed it was the best option for me.

    I am now nearly 3 years cancer free. I’ve had all of the preventative surgeries I can have knowing my cancer risk with the BRCA 2 gene. My dad tested positive for the gene as suspected all along and subsequently two of my cousins have now tested positive. One has just had a preventive double mastectomy. The other one was going to do the same but when she had her first mammogram at 36 it detected cancer. She has just had a double mastectomy and chemo and is about to start radiotherapy.

    This is where I get angry. If I was allowed to have the BRCA 2 test right in the beginning, my cancer and my cousin’s cancer may very well have been prevented. Also, if I hadn’t been so insistant with the GP to have the ultrasound I may have ended up in a much worse predicament. So I ask why did I have to fight for tests that should be easily accessible and fight for adequate treatment that I’m entitled to? Working in the health system I knew to ask about these things, someone without my knowledge may not have known what to ask. What would‘ve happened to them?